The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has questioned why the Tamil Nadu government should not permit the sale of toddy, while hearing a petition related to the shooting of a palm worker in Tenkasi district. The observation came during proceedings on a plea seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the incident involving palm worker Manikandan. The court’s remarks have reignited discussions on toddy regulation and government policy regarding traditional palm-based beverages in the state.
The petition was filed by Perumal Seth, father of Manikandan, who alleged that his son was taken to a palm grove by Alangulam Sub-Inspector Isakki Raja and other police personnel. According to the petition, Manikandan was compelled to inspect pots tied to palm trees to determine whether they contained toddy or palm nectar. The petitioner claimed that the shooting occurred thereafter and expressed concern that a police-led investigation would not ensure justice. He therefore requested that the case be transferred to the CBI for an independent inquiry.
Judicial Observations
Perumal Seth, Manikandan, SI Isakki Raja, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Tenkasi district, Alangulam
Shooting incident investigation, demand for CBI probe, interim restriction on police inquiry, toddy sales policy debate
Concerns over impartial investigation, judicial scrutiny, request for government clarification, issues affecting palm workers
Toddy sales permitted in Puducherry and Kerala, potential revenue implications, government response sought, case adjourned
Earlier, Justice Pugazhendhi had directed that the police officers concerned should not continue the investigation until further orders. Subsequently, relevant officials submitted a report in a sealed cover before the court. When the matter came up for hearing again on June 8, counsel representing SI Isakki Raja sought additional time to file a counter affidavit.
During the hearing, the judge observed that toddy sales are permitted in neighboring regions such as Puducherry and Kerala. He also noted that the Tamil Nadu government generates substantial revenue through state-regulated liquor sales, including through TASMAC outlets. In that context, the court questioned why a structured policy framework could not be considered for permitting toddy sales and suggested that such a move could potentially generate additional revenue for the state.
The court directed the state government to file a detailed response explaining its position on the issue and adjourned the matter for further hearing. An official response from the government is expected to play a key role in determining the future course of both the policy debate and the pending legal proceedings.
