The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has advised the Tamil Nadu government to take an appropriate decision on increasing financial assistance provided to fishermen during the annual fishing ban period before the next ban season begins. The direction came while hearing a petition filed by Dheeran Thirumurugan from Ramanathapuram, who sought an increase in the relief amount to ₹20,000, citing higher assistance provided by states such as Andhra Pradesh, Goa, and West Bengal. A Division Bench comprising Justices Karthikeyan and Sakthivel observed that fixing or enhancing the relief amount falls within the government’s policy domain, but recommended that the matter be considered in a timely manner in view of the concerns raised by the petitioner and the livelihood challenges faced by fishermen during the ban period.
Key Developments
Dheeran Thirumurugan, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Government of Tamil Nadu, Ramanathapuram, Andhra Pradesh, Goa, West Bengal
Petition seeking enhancement of fishing ban relief to ₹20,000, judicial emphasis on policy consideration, recommendation for a decision before the next ban season, increased attention to fishermen’s welfare
Petitioner cited higher relief provided by other states, seasonal loss of livelihood during the fishing ban, request for equitable financial assistance, government expected to examine the proposal
Court reaffirmed that financial assistance is a policy matter for the state, comparative welfare measures from other states were placed on record, potential review of the existing relief framework, fishermen await the government’s response before the next fishing ban
The Madurai Bench concluded that the enhancement of the fishing ban relief is a policy decision of the state government and directed that an appropriate decision be taken before the commencement of the next fishing ban period.
